Legal Opinion
State v. Kearney
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided December 23, 2003No. 2 CA-SA 2003-0101PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PELANDER, Presiding Judge.
¶ 1 In this special action, petitioner State of Arizona contends the respondent judge erred in ordering real party in interest Amy Lou Henderson to remain released on bond pending sentencing following her conviction for aggravated driving under the influence of an intoxicant (DUI) in violation of A.R.S. § 28 — 1383(A)(1). The state argues that, because Henderson must be imprisoned for four months pursuant to § 28-1383(D) even if she is granted probation, the respondent judge was required to order her “immediately placed into custody after conviction” pursuant…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State v. FellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- State v. NihiserCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
- State v. WomackCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
- State v. GeorgeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
- Arizona Department of Revenue v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- McCloud v. STATE, DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETYCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- Warner v. Southwest Desert Images, LLCCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- State v. BejaranoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- Bridgestone/Firestone North America Tire, L.L.C. v. A.P.S. Rent-A-Car & Leasing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
- State v. BarnettCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.