State v. Ingram
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINIÓN
RANDALL, Judge.
Appellant challenges his conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm, arguing that the pistol seized must be suppressed because it was the fruit of an illegal search and seizure. We affirm.
FACTS
On February 9, 1996, at approximately 5:15 p.m., Minneapolis Police Officers Matthew Segulia and David Gray were on patrol when they were flagged down by a citizen at the intersection of Nicollet and Seventh Street. The citizen told the officers that a man in a dark “Hoyas” jacket and a white kerchief on his head was in the bus shelter around the corner, trying to sell…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Minnesota v. DickersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. BergersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- State v. OlsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- State v. MorinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
- Jackson v. City of Brooklyn CenterDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2023
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.