Legal Opinion

State v. Morin

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 26, 2007No. A06-602, A06-604, A06-605, A06-606PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DIETZEN, Judge.

In this consolidated appeal, four appellants challenge their convictions of consumption of alcohol by a minor, and one appellant challenges an additional conviction of possession of marijuana, arguing that the district court erred in denying their joint motion to suppress. Additionally, one appellant challenges a conviction of obstruction of legal process on the ground that the evidence was insufficient to support a conviction. Because the district court properly applied the law and did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to suppress, we affirm the convictions…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Welsh v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. United States v. SantanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Brian Thomas Hoyland v. Shawn McMenomyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
  2. Rich v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  3. State v. PedersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
  4. State v. LitzauCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
  5. Brian Thomas Hoyland v. Shawn McMenomyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API