State v. Morin
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DIETZEN, Judge.
In this consolidated appeal, four appellants challenge their convictions of consumption of alcohol by a minor, and one appellant challenges an additional conviction of possession of marijuana, arguing that the district court erred in denying their joint motion to suppress. Additionally, one appellant challenges a conviction of obstruction of legal process on the ground that the evidence was insufficient to support a conviction. Because the district court properly applied the law and did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to suppress, we affirm the convictions…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Welsh v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. SantanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Brian Thomas Hoyland v. Shawn McMenomyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
- Rich v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2012
- State v. PedersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
- State v. LitzauCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
- Brian Thomas Hoyland v. Shawn McMenomyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.