People v. Smith
California Supreme Court
Appeal- from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sonoma County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Searls, C.
Defendant was convicted of the crime of forgery, and appeals from the judgment and from an order denying a new trial. There were two counts in the information filed against him. In the first it is charged he did, on or about November 6,1893, willfully, unlawfully, knowingly, and feloniously, and with intent then and there to defraud, prejudice, and damage E. S. Southerland and the Santa Rosa Bank (a corporation, etc.), falsely make, forge, and counterfeit a certain check in the words and figures as follows, to wit:
“ Santa Eosa, Cal., Nov. 6, 1893.
“No.191.
“Santa Eosa Bank,pay to John…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. ShotwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- Langdon v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
- Miller v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1866
- People v. MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Tucker v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- People v. MattesonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- People v. GeibelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- People v. NorwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- People v. LeyshonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- People v. KatzmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.