Legal Opinion

Kiesow v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1934PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

The respondefit Greening was injured in 1926 and again in 1929. Both injuries were similar in nature and resulted in fractures of the metatarsal bones of the right foot. Following each injury operations were performed on the foot for the purpose of eliminating pain due to á traumatic arthritis. Compensation was allowed for the first injury and a compromise made on the basis of a thirty-five per cent, disability to the foot. Upon the hearing on the application for compensation for the second injury, there was testimony by physicians that Greening had a permanent disability in the right foot at…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. M. & M. Realty Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Mednis v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Polzin v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Nash-Kelvinator Corp. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
  5. M. & M. Realty Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API