Legal Opinion
Polzin v. Industrial Commission
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided June 26, 1958PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMartin, C. J.
Appellant raises two questions on appeal. First, it is contended that since there is no evidence in the record that he sustained a 10 per cent permanent disability, the finding of 10 per cent was pure speculation by the commission.
In Sheehan v. Industrial Comm. (1956), 272 Wis. 595, 600, 76 N. W. (2d) 343, this court reiterated the rule that—
“The determination of the extent or duration of disability of an applicant for workmen’s compensation presents a question of fact and not of law, and the findings are conclusive if supported by credible evidence. Squires v. Industrial Comm. (1946), 248…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Giant Grip Manufacturing Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
- Sheehan v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
- Gallenberg v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
- McCune v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
- Kiesow v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Fitz v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
- Pfister & Vogel Tanning Co. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- Manitowoc County v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- Gallagher v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960