Legal Opinion
Danow v. Law Office of David E. Borback, P.A.
District Court, S.D. Florida
Decided June 10, 2009No. 05-61562-CIVPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POST-TRIAL ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS
TED E. BANDSTRA, United States Magistrate Judge.
THIS CAUSE is before the Court on (a) Plaintiffs Verified Motion for an Award of Costs and Attorney’s Fees (D.E. 146) filed on November 17, 2008; and (b) Defendant’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees and Costs (D.E. 141) filed on November 1, 2008. This case was previously tried by jury before the undersigned on June 23 and 24, 2008, resulting in a jury verdict in favor of plaintiff, Harry L. Danow, in the amount of $1,000.00. 1 Plaintiff now seeks attorney’s fees and costs in the total amount of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mattie Norman, Clara Marshall, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. The Housing Authority of the City of MontgomeryCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
- Marek v. ChesnySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Craig v. FCA US LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
- Lomeli v. FCA US LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
- Meza v. FCA US LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
- PNC BANK, N.A. v. Kool Stuff Designs, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2025
- Roberto v. Addison Place Apartments Property Owner LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2025