Legal Opinion

Meza v. FCA US LLC

District Court, E.D. California

Decided June 30, 2023No. 1:22-cv-00828Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ROMELIO C. MEZA, No. 1:22-cv-00828-ADA-EPG 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PARTIES’ STIPULATION TO ENTRY OF JUDGMENT 13 v. UNDER FED. R. CIV. P. 68 AND GRANTING PARTIES’ STIPULATION TO 14 FCA US, LLC, PLAINTIFF’S ATTORNEYS’ FEES, COSTS, AND EXPENSES 15 Defendant. (ECF Nos. 17, 18) 16 17 On July 6, 2022, Plaintiff Romelio C. Meza (“Plaintiff”) commenced this action against 18 Defendant FCA US, LLC (“Defendant”), alleging violations of California Civil Code §§ 1793.2(d), 19 1793.2(b), 1793.2(A)(3), and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Marek v. ChesnySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Ronald J. Radecki and Radecki's Service, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation v. Amoco Oil Company, a Maryland CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
  3. Pat Jordan v. Time, Incorporated, Pat Jordan v. Time, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
  4. Nusom v. Comh Woodburn, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  5. Monica Beauchamp v. Anaheim Union High School DistCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API