Legal Opinion

Lomeli v. FCA US LLC

District Court, E.D. California

Decided October 2, 2023No. 1:22-cv-00666Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LUIS LOMELI, et al., No. 1:22-cv-00666-ADA-CDB 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING PARTIES’ STIPULATION TO ENTRY OF JUDGMENT 13 v. UNDER FED. R. CIV. P. 68 14 FCA US, LLC, (ECF No. 31) 15 Defendant. 16 17 On June 2, 2022, Plaintiffs Luis Lomeli and Jessica Lomeli (“Plaintiffs”) commenced this 18 action against Defendant FCA US, LLC (“Defendant”), alleging violations of the California Song- 19 Beverly Act and 15 U.S.C. § 2310, the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act. (See ECF No. 1.) Currently 20 before the Court is…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Marek v. ChesnySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Ronald J. Radecki and Radecki's Service, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation v. Amoco Oil Company, a Maryland CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
  3. Pat Jordan v. Time, Incorporated, Pat Jordan v. Time, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
  4. Nusom v. Comh Woodburn, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  5. Monica Beauchamp v. Anaheim Union High School DistCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API