Commonwealth v. Rispo
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Jacobs, J.,
At issue in this appeal is whether defendant has waived his duplicity-of-sentences claim. We hold that the claim has been waived.
The claim arises from defendant’s convictions, along with his codefendants, on three bills of indictment. Each bill charged defendant with blackmail and extortion, the only difference in the bills lying in the particular of the specified date. The evidence at trial showed that on each of the three dates specified in the bills the defendant committed acts of blackmail and extortion, all acts being directed at the same victim and all designed to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Commonwealth v. CheeksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Commonwealth v. MarinoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
- Commonwealth v. SatchellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Commonwealth v. MARINOSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Commonwealth v. MaysSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Commonwealth v. WalkerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Commonwealth v. KellySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Commonwealth v. TisdaleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. LaneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. BrunnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.