Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Lane

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 22, 1975No. Appeal, 532PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Spaeth, J.,

Appellant made four separate sales of heroin to undercover agents over a two-week period and as a result was indicted on two bills, each bill having two counts charging possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance, 1 two counts charging possession of a controlled substance, 2 and two counts charging delivery of a controlled substance. 3 At a jury trial before Judge Strauss, demurrers to the counts charging possession with intent to deliver were sustained, but appellant was convicted on the possession and delivery counts. Following a pre-sen-tence investigation…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. TisdaleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Commonwealth v. RispoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  3. Commonwealth v. WalkerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Commonwealth v. LovettSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1971

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State v. LenihanMontana Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Commonwealth v. McKennaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Commonwealth v. MourarSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Commonwealth v. PerdueSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Commonwealth v. WolfeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API