Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Marino

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 27, 1969No. Appeal, 185PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Eagen,

Francis Marino, Arthur Ashkenase and Salvatore Rispo, Jr., were found guilty in Philadelphia of the crimes of blackmail and conspiracy following a joint trial before the Honorable Edmund B. Spaeth, Jr., sitting without a jury. Post-trial motions were denied and judgments of sentence were imposed. On appeal, the Superior Court unanimously affirmed the convictions and judgments entered against Ashkenase and Rispo. In the case of Marino, the Superior Court likewise affirmed, but Judge Watkins filed a dissenting opinion in which Judge Hoppman joined. See 213 Pa.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. JeffriesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Commonwealth v. KlochSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Commonwealth v. BradleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  4. Commonwealth v. KenneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  5. Commonwealth v. ReeceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API