Legal Opinion · Dissent

Grisel v. Oregon State Penitentiary

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1981No. 02-80-169, CA 17178, SC 27277Published

1DissentLinde, J.

The rule adopted by the Corrections Division to provide due process in prison disciplinary procedures, as ordered by the United States District Court, provides as follows:

"(5) The evidence considered by the Hearings Officer will be of such credibility as would be considered by reasonable persons in the conduct of their affairs:
"(a) When unidentified informant, testimony is presented to the Hearings Officer, the identity of the informant or the verbatim statement of the informant, or both, shall be revealed to the Hearings Officer.
"(b) Information must be submitted to the Hearings Officer upon…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Grisel v. Oregon State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API