Legal Opinion
First National Bank in Dallas v. Zimmerman
Texas Supreme Court
Decided June 11, 1969No. B-1366PublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GREENHILL, Justice.
This action for damages for breach of contract was instituted by First National Bank in Dallas as executor of the estate of Murray Samuell, deceased. Samuell and his associate, Hugh McLaughlin, undertook negotiations in 1962 to purchase the minerals in 20,000 acres of land in the State of Tennessee owned by a Mr. Shook. As a result of these negotiations, Shook’s agent, Dillon A. Green, sent Samuell a letter dated April 10, 1962, in which he stated: “I herewith offer to sell to you approximately 20,000 acres of mineral interest land lying in Grundy, Sequatchie, Bledsoe and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Petroleum Anchor Equipment, Inc. v. TyraTexas Supreme Court · 1967
- International Harvester Co. of America v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1906
- Edwards v. StrongTexas Supreme Court · 1948
- Reid v. Associated Employers LloydsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
- TIME, INC. v. Maryland Casualty CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1957
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Davis v. City of San AntonioTexas Supreme Court · 1988
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. AlexanderTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- Thomas v. OldhamTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- Phillips v. PhillipsTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- City of Waco v. Hester, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1991
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.