Legal Opinion
TIME, INC. v. Maryland Casualty Company
Texas Supreme Court
Decided March 13, 1957No. A-6075PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Calvert
In this case and on this appeal there are two major legal problems, one substantive and one procedural, as follows: Was Alphonse Munroe an insured within the terms of a policy of garage liability insurance issued by respondent? If he was not, did respondent insurer lose its right to assert that fact as a defense to a suit on the policy by failing to plead that he was not? The trial court and the Court of Civil Appeals have held that Munroe was not an insured and that respondent did not lose its right to assert that fact as a defense. See 294 S.W. 2d 746. We agree with the first holding but…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Travelers' Ins. Co. v. HarrisTexas Commission of Appeals · 1919
- Lumber Mutual Casualty Ins. Co. v. StukesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1947
- Washington Fidelity Nat. Ins. Co. v. WilliamsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
- Pelican Insurance v. Troy Co-operative Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1890
- International Travelers Ass'n v. MarshallTexas Supreme Court · 1938
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Davis v. City of San AntonioTexas Supreme Court · 1988
- Aetna Insurance v. KleinTexas Supreme Court · 1959
- Aetna Insurance Co. v. KleinTexas Supreme Court · 1959
- Hardware Dealers Mutual Insurance Co. v. BerglundTexas Supreme Court · 1965
- First National Bank in Dallas v. ZimmermanTexas Supreme Court · 1969
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.