Legal Opinion

Reid v. Associated Employers Lloyds

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided September 4, 1942No. 14414PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McDONALD, Chief Justice.

This is a compensation suit. The pleadings and proof establish that plaintiff had for a considerable period of time been employed as a truck driver for a concern handling fruits, vegetables and other food products. Plaintiff was injured while unloading a keg of beer. By testimony offered by defendant, which is undisputed, it is shown that plaintiff did not at any time material herein have a health certificate, such as is required by what is commonly referred to as Art. 705c of Vernon’s Annotated Penal Code. Plaintiff appeals from a judgment non obstante veredicto,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Le Master v. Fort Worth Transit Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Rogers v. Traders & General Ins. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1940
  3. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. LuskCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  4. Rogers v. Traders & General InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Traders & General Ins. Co. v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Phillips v. PhillipsTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Gorman v. Life Insurance Co. of North AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Man Engines & Components, Inc. and Man Nutzfahrzeuge Aktiengesellschaft v. Doug ShowsTexas Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Petroleum Anchor Equipment, Inc. v. TyraTexas Supreme Court · 1967
  5. First National Bank in Dallas v. ZimmermanTexas Supreme Court · 1969

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API