Legal Opinion

Jordan v. Southern Wood Piedmont Co.

District Court, S.D. Georgia

Decided July 14, 1992No. Civ. A. CV191-108, CV191-063PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

BOWEN, District Judge.

Defendant Dow Chemical Co. (“Dow”) moves the Court for summary judgment in CV191-108 and CV191-063. 1 This Order resolves Dow’s Motions for Summary Judgment in both CV191-108 and CV191-063 because the issues in these cases are grounded in a common set of circumstances. Jurisdiction is predicated on 28 U.S.C. § 1331 in CV191-108 and on 28 U.S.C. § 1332 in CV191-063.

1. BACKGROUND

The Plaintiffs in both cases 2 own real estate in the immediate vicinity of an Augusta, Georgia, wood treatment plant owned and operated by ITT Rayonier, ITT Corporation and Southern Wood…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Wisconsin Public Intervenor v. MortierSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. The State of New York v. Shore Realty Corp. And Donald LeograndeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. R.R. Street & Co. v. Pilgrim Enterprises, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Ekotek Site PRP Committee v. SelfDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1995
  3. R.R. Street & Co. v. Pilgrim Enterprises, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2002
  4. United States v. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. Parks Hiway Enterprises, LLC v. CEM Leasing, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2000

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API