United States v. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The full court has been advised of the petitions for rehearing en banc. A judge of the court requested a vote on en banc rehearing. The majority of the active judges have voted to deny rehearing the matter en banc. Fed. R.App. P. 35(f).
The panel has voted to amend its opinion and to deny appellees’ petitions for rehearing with the following amendments.
The opinion filed March 16, 2007 and amended September 4, 2007, published at 502 F.3d 781 (9th Cir.2007), is hereby further amended as follows:
1.On page 790, add a new footnote 5 after <When the trucks carrying D-D ... large tanks by hoses.…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited39 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Robinson Rancheria Citizens Council v. Borneo, Inc. Clear Lake Indian Bingo Ltd. American Arbitration Association Herman SchnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- O'Melveny & Myers v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Aviall Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Amadeo v. ZantSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Atherton v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Joseph Pakootas v. Teck Cominco Metals, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Celanese Corp. v. Martin K. Eby Const. Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
- LYONDELL CHEMICAL CO. v. Occidental Chemical Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. P.H. Glatfelter CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.