Tetterton v. Long Manufacturing Co.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HEDRICK, Judge.
The record shows that all parties entered into the following stipulation:(4) For the sole purpose of this appeal, summary judgment on behalf of Long Manufacturing Company, Inc. would only be appropriate if plaintiffs action is barred by the applicable North Carolina statute of limitations.
The only assignment of error brought forward and argued in plaintiffs brief is set out in the record as follows:
I. The Court improperly granted Motion for Summary Judgment by defendant Long Manufacturing Company, Inc., in that the statute upon which defendant’s Motion was based is…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Edelman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Pigott v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Wilcox v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Johnson v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Midrex Corp. v. LynchCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
3Cited by5 opinions
- Tetterton v. Long Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- Davidson v. Volkswagenwerk, A.G.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Gardner v. Asbestos Corp., Ltd.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1986
- Kirkman v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
- Tetterton v. Long Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984