Legal Opinion

Midrex Corp. v. Lynch

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 17, 1981No. 8026SC616PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN (Harry C.), Judge.

The resolution of this appeal turns upon the meaning of the phrase “accounts payable” as it appears in N.C.G.S. 105-201. The relevant portions of the statute are:

Accounts receivable. — All accounts receivable on December 31 of each year... shall be subject to an annual tax... Provided, that from the face value of such accounts receivable there may be deducted the accounts payable of the taxpayer as of the valuation date of the accounts receivable....

The term “accounts payable” as used in this section shall not include:(1) Reserves, secondary liabilities or contingent…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Gould v. GouldSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Edelman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. Appeal of Clayton-Marcus Company, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  4. State v. . LuedersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  5. Black-Clawson Co. v. EvattOhio Supreme Court · 1941

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Tetterton v. Long Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  2. Peace River Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Ward Transformer Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  3. Croker v. Yadkin, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  4. Regional Acceptance Corp. v. PowersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  5. Nelson v. Battle Forest Friends MeetingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API