Legal Opinion

Stewart v. Gallimore

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 24, 1965No. 534PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Upon a motion for judgment as of nonsuit the evidence must be considered in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, all reasonable inferences in his favor must be drawn therefrom and all conflicts must be resolved in his favor. Coleman v. Colonial Stores, Inc., 259 N.C. 241, 130 S.E. 2d 338; Ammons v. Britt, 256 N.C. 248, 123 S.E. 2d 579; Jenkins v. Electric Co., 254 N.C. 553, 119 S.E. 2d 767. A nonsuit on the ground of plaintiff’s contributory negligence can be granted only when his own evidence shows such negligence by him so clearly that no other reasonable inference can be drawn…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. Leftwich Electric CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  2. Coleman v. Colonial Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  3. Harvell v. Weldon Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  4. Ammons v. BrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  5. Burgess v. CG TATE CONSTRUCTION COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bowen v. GardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  2. Clark v. BodycombeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  3. Blow v. ShaughnessyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  4. Forsyth County v. SheltonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  5. Grimes v. GibertCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API