State v. King
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
NEHRING, Justice:
INTRODUCTION
T1 For the second time we rule on a challenge to the composition of the jury that convicted Gordon King of aggravated sexual abuse of a child. On certiorari from the court of appeals, we previously held that Mr. King both failed to preserve his objection to the seating of two potentially biased jurors and failed to demonstrate why his oversight should be excused. We remanded the case to the court of appeals to consider whether the conduct of Mr. King's attorney that allowed the potentially biased jurors to be seated constituted ineffective assistance of counsel.…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Smith v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Morgan v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Ross v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- People v. ManningIllinois Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. Martinez-CastellanosUtah Supreme Court · 2018
- State v. Bates (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
- State v. SessionsUtah Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. LovellUtah Supreme Court · 2011
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.