Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Manning

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 2011No. 109029PublishedCited by 84 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Garman

Justices Thomas and Theis concurred in the judgment and opinion.

Chief Justice Kilbride specially concurred, with opinion.

Justice Karmeier specially concurred, with opinion.

Justice Freeman dissented, with opinion, joined by Justice Burke.

OPINION

Following a jury trial in the circuit court of Du Page County, defendant, Arthur R. Manning, was convicted of one count of possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver (720 ILCS 570/401(a)(2)(A) (West 2004)) and one count of possession of a controlled substance (720 ILCS 570/402(c) (West 2004)). He was sentenced to concurrent prison terms…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Michel v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  4. People v. AlbaneseIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Larry David Davis v. Jeanne S. Woodford, Warden, of California State Prison at San QuentinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by84 opinions

  1. People v. WhiteIllinois Supreme Court · 2011
  2. People v. Austin M.Illinois Supreme Court · 2012
  3. People v. RinehartIllinois Supreme Court · 2012
  4. State of Arizona v. Efren MedinaArizona Supreme Court · 2013
  5. State v. Bates (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020

79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API