A. H. Bull S. S. Co. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the CourtL. Hand, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). The speed of the Chinook was very slight. She had got only a few hundred feet over the ground when she was struck, and though this proves that she was under way, since she was breasting a substantial tide, it also shows that she could not have acquired much momentum. Her equivocal navigation resulted from her failure to forecast what the course of the Clare was to be; she supposed the vessels would pass starboard to starboard, because the Clare was headed across her bows; indeed, Mr. Gray even insists that it was a crossing case. It was neither of these hut…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- The New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- The Albert DumoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- The HallgrimCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
- United States v. GrantCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1926
3Cited by45 opinions
- China Union Lines, Ltd., Mitsubishi International Corporation, Lan Jing-Chau, Armement Deppe, S.A. v. A. O. Andersen & Co., American Cyanamid CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
- National Bulk Carriers, Inc. v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
- Construction Aggregates Co. v. Long Island R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
- The San SimeonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
- New York, N. H. & H. R. v. Long Island R.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.