Legal Opinion
The Hallgrim
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided July 19, 1927No. 307PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtL. Hand, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). Of the disputed issues we think the most important are the place of collision and the heading of the Annam. The first is established by all the disinterested evidence, and was found by the judge to have been close beside buoy 17, where the Annam lay. The Havre Maru, as is in such eases to be expected, put it much further out in the lane, but the testimony of the Annam and of a British ship, the Ixion, leaves us no reasonable option but to accept the Hallgrim’s version. The second issue is equally well proved except for the testimony of Smith, of the Ixion,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- The Victory & the PlymothianSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Commonwealth & Dominion Line, Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
- Lake Erie Transp. Co. v. Gilchrist Transp. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1906
- The NewburghCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
- The ArrowCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1914
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Movible Offshore, Inc. v. The M/v Wilken A. Falgout, Her Engines, Tackle, Etc., Gulf and South American Steamship Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- A. H. Bull S. S. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
- Construction Aggregates Co. v. Long Island R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
- The San SimeonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
- Pennsylvania R. v. Delaware L. & W. R.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.