Legal Opinion

In Re Commitment of Bryant Oliver Tutter v. the State of Texas

Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)

Decided August 14, 2025No. 09-23-00351-CVPublished

1Opinion of the Court

In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont __________________ NO. 09-23-00351-CV __________________ IN RE COMMITMENT OF BRYANT OLIVER TUTTER __________________________________________________________________ On Appeal from the 359th District Court Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 22-10-13793-CV __________________________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION A jury unanimously found beyond a reasonable doubt that Bryant Oliver Tutter is a sexually violent predator pursuant to the Sexually Violent Predators Act (“SVP Act”). See

Tex. Health & Safety…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Maritime Overseas Corp. v. EllisTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Burrow v. ArceTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Coastal Transport Co. v. Crown Central Petroleum Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2004
  4. City of San Antonio v. PollockTexas Supreme Court · 2009
  5. in Re Commitment of David Dodson, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API