Legal Opinion

City of San Antonio v. Pollock

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 2009No. 04-1118PublishedCited by 376 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hecht

in which Chief Justice JEFFERSON, Justice WAINWRIGHT, Justice JOHNSON and Justice WILLETT joined, and in all but Part II-C of which Justice BRISTER joined.

When the government maintains a public nuisance that it knows is substantially certain to cause a specific injury to private property, it may be required by article I, *812section 17 of the Texas Constitution1 to provide adequate compensation for taking or damaging the property.2 The claim in this case is that benzene from a closed municipal waste disposal site migrated through the soil to a nearby home, reducing its value and causing the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. HavnerTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Maritime Overseas Corp. v. EllisTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Burrow v. ArceTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Coastal Transport Co. v. Crown Central Petroleum Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2004
  5. City of Tyler v. LikesTexas Supreme Court · 1998

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by376 opinions

  1. In re LipskyTexas Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Jelinek v. CasasTexas Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Gharda USA, Inc. and Gharda Chemicals, Ltd. v. Control Solutions, Inc., United Phosphorus, Inc., and Mark BoydTexas Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Whirlpool Corp. v. CamachoTexas Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America v. JustissTexas Supreme Court · 2012

371 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API