Legal Opinion
Spangler v. UNUM Life Insurance Co. of America
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma
Decided March 5, 1999No. 4:98-cv-00702PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JOYNER, United States Magistrate Judge.
On March 4, 1999, this Court heard argument on Defendant’s Motion for a Protective Order to prohibit further discovery. [Doc. No. 12-1]. Timothy A. Carney and Julie Doss appeared on behalf of the Defendant UNUM Life Insurance Company of America (“UNUM”). Steven V. Buck-man appeared on behalf of the Plaintiffs. Having heard the argument of counsel, having reviewed the briefs filed by the parties and the applicable case law, the Court hereby finds that Defendant’s Motion for a Protective Order should be GRANTED.
Background
On August 17, 1997, L.G.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Dan M.. Sandoval v. Aetna Life And Casualty Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- Chambers v. Family Health Plan Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Sherrie A. Farley v. Arkansas Blue Cross and Blue Shield, a Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- Palmer v. University Medical GroupDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1997
- Hensley v. Northwest Permanente P.C. Retirement Plan & TrustDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1998
3Cited by9 opinions
- Shirley O. Fought v. Unum Life Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- Kohut v. Hartford Life & Accident InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2008
- Fought v. UNUM Life Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- Panther v. Synthes (U.S.A.)District Court, D. Kansas · 2005
- Waggener v. Unum Life Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.