Hensley v. Northwest Permanente P.C. Retirement Plan & Trust
District Court, D. Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STEWART, United States Magistrate Judge.
INTRODUCTION
This is a class action under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001-1461 (“ERISA”). Plaintiffs are nurse practitioners or physician assistants. On behalf of themselves and the class of similarly situated individuals, plaintiffs allege that they are employed by Northwest Permanente, P.C. (“NWP”) and have satisfied all eligibility requirements of, and therefore are entitled to participate in, the Northwest Permanente P.C. Retirement Plan and Trust (“NWP Plan”) and the Permanente Physicians Retirement Plan…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Richard Atwood v. Newmont Gold Co., Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Donald F. Bogue v. Ampex Corporation and Allied-Signal, Inc. Does 1-10, InclusiveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- 20 Employee Benefits Cas. 1375, 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4487, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 7305, Pens. Plan Guide P 23921c Gloria Snow v. Standard Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Barbara A. Dytrt v. The Mountain State Telephone and Telegraph CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Nagele v. Electronic Data Systems Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 2000
- Spangler v. UNUM Life Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1999
- Hawkins v. Arctic Slope Regional Corp.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2002
- LaPrease v. Unum Life Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2004
- Galm v. Eaton Corp.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.