Legal Opinion
Billhofer v. Flamel Technologies, S.A.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 15, 2012No. 07 Civ. 9920PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Lead Plaintiff George Jenkins (“Plaintiff’ or “Proposed Class Representative”) has moved pursuant to Rules 23(a) and 23(b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for class certification, certification of class representative, and appointment of class counsel.
Based on the facts and conclusions set forth below, Plaintiffs motion is granted, the class and class representatives are certified and co-class counsel are appointed.
*153 I. Prior Proceedings
The complaint in this putative class action, alleging securities fraud against Flamel Technologies S.A. (“Flamel”) and…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- ATSI Communications, Inc. v. Shaar Fund, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. BroudoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Eisenberg v. GagnonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Carpenters Pension Trust Fund v. Barclays PLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Fort Worth Employees' Retirement Fund v. J.P. Morgan Chase & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- McIntire v. China MediaExpress Holdings, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- In re Facebook, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Strougo v. Barclays PLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.