Legal Opinion
Whitzell v. Barnhart
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided July 29, 2005No. CIV.A.04-11532-WGYPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
YOUNG, Chief Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
The plaintiff Pamela M. Whitzell (‘Whitzell”) brings this action pursuant to section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), seeking judicial review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (the “Commissioner”). Whitzell challenges the decision of the Administrative Law Judge (“hearing officer”) denying her application for Supplemental Security Income. She argues “that the Commissioner erred as a matter of law in determining that she is not entitled to benefits and issued a decision which was not based on…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Maria S. Rodriguez v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
- Nicasio RODRIGUEZ PAGAN, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- 14 soc.sec.rep.ser. 301, unempl.ins.rep. Cch 16,883 Ernest S. Avery v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
- Joseph T. FRUSTAGLIA, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Pires v. AstrueDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2008
- DaSilva-Santos v. AstrueDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2009
- WHITZELL v. AstrueDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2008
- Whitzell v. BarnhartDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2006