Legal Opinion
Whitzell v. Barnhart
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided April 18, 2006No. Civil Action 04-11532-WGYPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
YOUNG, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This Court has already fully considered this Social Security disability case and rendered a thorough opinion, remanding the case to the Commissioner for further proceedings. Whitzell v. Barnhart, 379 F.Supp.2d 204 (D.Mass.2005). Prior to re mand, this Court denied Pamela Whitzell’s (“Whitzell”) request for attorneys’ fees without explanation. Id. at 220.
Instead of returning to the Commissioner, however, Whitzell appealed. [Doc. No. 22], During the course of the appeal, all parties agreed that this Court was in error in failing fully to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Shalala v. SchaeferSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Melkonyan v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Seavey v. Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- David HEGGARTY, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. Louis W. SULLIVAN, MD, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Perkins v. AstrueDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2008
- Blaney v. BerryhillDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2020
- Colon v. Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2018
- Smyth v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2021