Legal Opinion
WHITZELL v. Astrue
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided December 10, 2008No. Civil Action 06-11951-WGYPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
YOUNG, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), Pamela Whitzell (“Whitzell”) brings this motion to remand an unfavorable decision of Michael J. Astrue, the Commissioner (“Commissioner”) of the Social Security Administration (“Administration”).
Whitzell claims that the Commissioner deprived her of an opportunity to appeal from the decision, which was issued after a consolidated hearing regarding her two applications. Whitzell’s Memorandum in Support (“PI. Memo.”) at 11. She also alleges that the determination concerning her disability was not supported…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Morton v. RuizSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- John G. Myers v. Elliot L. Richardson, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1972
- William D. Cox v. Joseph A. Califano, Secretary of Health, Education & WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- WHITZELL v. AstrueDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2011
- Seeger v. U.S. Dep't of Def.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Alexander M. v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2026
- Galarza-Pagan v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2025
- Seeger v. United States Department of DefenseDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018