Legal Opinion
Monaco v. Home-Owners Insurance Company
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided November 15, 2016No. Docket 329214PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMurphy, J.
In this dispute concerning the recovery of personal protection insurance benefits, commonly referred to as PIP benefits, under the no-fault act, MCL 500.3101 et seq., defendant, Home-Owners Insurance Company (HOIC), appeals as of right the judgment entered in favor of plaintiff, Laura Monaco (hereafter, plaintiff), and intervening plaintiffs, Covenant Medical Center, Inc., and Mary Free Bed Rehabilitation Hospital (hereafter, the medical providers). The judgment reflected the verdict rendered by a jury following trial and certain stipulations between HOIC and the medical providers regarding…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Skinner v. Square D Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1994
- Lewis v. LeGrowMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
- Kevin Krohn v. Home-Owners Ins CoMichigan Supreme Court · 2011
- Whitman v. City of BurtonMichigan Supreme Court · 2013
- Spectrum Health Hospitals v. Farm Bureau Mutual Ins Co of MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kiara Myers v. Enterprise Leasing Company of Detroit LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019
- Kim Bradley v. Westfield Insurance CompanyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2024
- Mohamed Ahmed v. Tokio Marine America Insurance CompanyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2021
- Pamela Johnson v. Michigan Automobile Insurance Placement FacilityMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
- Swoope v Citizens Insurance Company of the MidwestMichigan Supreme Court · 2026