Jenkins v. Handel
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CARPENETI, Justice.
I, INTRODUCTION
Erma Jenkins appeals the superior court's denial of her motion to modify custody. Because the superior court carefully considered and weighed the factors relevant to the best interests of the children, we conclude that the superior court did not abuse its discretion. We therefore affirm.
II, FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
A. Facts
Erma Jenkins and John Handel lived together for approximately ten years. While living in Thorne Bay, they had two children, AH., born May 4, 1988, and LH., born March 27, 1985. Jenkins and Handel never married. The children have lived in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- S.N.E. v. R.L.B.Alaska Supreme Court · 1985
- Gratrix v. GratrixAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
- Veazey v. VeazeyAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
- Reid v. WilliamsAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
- King v. KingAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Ebertz v. EbertzAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
- Fernandes v. PortwineAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
- Barrett v. AlguireAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
- Fardig v. FardigAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
- Hamilton v. HamiltonAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.