Dorow v. Santa Clara County Flood Control District
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DAVID, J. pro tem. *
This is an appeal from a summary judgment for respondent upon a complaint wherein appellant sought to recover damages under California Constitution, article I, section 14, for an alleged taking and damaging of her private property for public use. The theory asserted was inverse condemnation.
It competently appears that in 1953 plaintiff acquired property in Mountain View, across which Permanente Creek flows. The respondent in 1963 undertook a project to improve the creek bed, in the course of which it installed a box culvert or pipes in plaintiff’s portion of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Rose v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Pierpont Inn, Inc. v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Powers Farms, Inc. v. Consolidated Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Hawkins v. Oakland Title Insurance & Guaranty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1958
- Bellman v. County of Contra CostaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- City of San Jose v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Wyoming State Highway Department v. NapolitanoWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
- City of Oakland v. NutterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Stone v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Cory v. City of Huntington BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.