Jones v. Kelly
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.
Appeal prosecuted by plaintiffs, husband and wife, from an action to recover damages, both actual and exemplary, for the alleged destruction by defendant of the plaintiffs’ water supply, the parties occupying the relation of landlord and tenant. A demurrer, both general and special, to the amended complaint was sustained without leave to amend, and judgment thereupon entered in favor of the defendant. From the fact that the demurrer was sustained without leave to amend the amended complaint it is apparent that the trial court was of the opinion that a cause of action could not be predicated…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Rich v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Mobile Life Insurance v. RandallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
- Harding v. Liberty Hospital Corp.California Supreme Court · 1918
- Stock v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
3Cited by52 opinions
- Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Tameny v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 1980
- Comunale v. Traders & General InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Applied Equipment Corp. v. Litton Saudi Arabia Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1994
- Erlich v. MenezesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.