Legal Opinion

Ott v. St. Paul Union Stockyards

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 18, 1929No. 27,405PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

Action for personal injuries wherein plaintiff appeals from a judgment for defendant entered on the pleadings.

In February, 1925, while plaintiff was an employe of the Standard Cattle Company, a “market agency” operating on the premises of defendant at South St. Paul, he Avas injured by a large icicle falling from a water tank owned by defendant. Plaintiff first sought to recover from his employer under the workmen’s compensation act. He was denied such recovery by the decision of the industrial commission, affirmed here (Ott v. Standard Cattle Co. 170 Minn. 410, 212 N. W. 813) upon the ground…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Rasmussen v. George Benz & SonsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  2. Behr v. SothSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  3. Uotila v. Oliver Iron Mining Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  4. Barton v. Oklahoma, K. & M. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. Miller v. New York Railways Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Boek v. Wong HingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  2. First National Bank v. FlynnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  3. Tocci's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  4. Smith v. Kedney Warehouse Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  5. Devere v. PartenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API