Legal Opinion

Sharp v. Bowie

California Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1904No. S.F. No. 2648PublishedCited by 15 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtBeatty, C. J.

November 6, 1891, the defendants were sole owners of block 664, Outside Lands, San Francisco, and were desirous of selling it in subdivisions, but were hindered by the pendency of a suit theretofore instituted by the plaintiff to quiet her alleged title to an undivided half of the block. To obviate this difficulty they entered into a written contract with plaintiff by which they agreed to pay her one thousand dollars down and three thousand dollars more within the ensuing six months in consideration of her agreement to quitclaim her interest in the block as follows: She was to quitclaim and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Swift v. Occidental Mining & Petroleum Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Perry v. QuackenbushCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Marsh v. LottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
  2. Cameron v. Ah QuongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Coburn v. California Portland Cement Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Jenson v. Will & Finck Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Wells, Fargo & Co. v. McCarthyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API