Legal Opinion

Stevens v. Inland Waters, Inc

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided February 25, 1997No. Docket 177140PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWahls, P.J.

Plaintiff appeals as of right from the trial court’s grant of defendants’ motion for summary disposition in this case brought under the Michigan Handicappers’ Civil Rights Act (hcra), MCL 37.1101 et seq.\ MSA 3.550(101) et seq. The trial court granted defendants’ motion on the basis that smoking is not a handicap within the meaning of the hcra and specifically that “[nicotine] addiction is [not] synonymous with handicap.” We affirm.

Plaintiff began working as a security guard with defendant Inland Waters, Inc., in September 1983. Defendant Benjamin Rusch became plaintiffs supervisor. Although…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Dutcher v. Ingalls ShipbuildingCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  2. E. E. Black, Ltd. v. MarshallDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1980
  3. Pulver v. Dundee Cement Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. Raymond C.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1994
  5. Lumley v. U of M Bd of RegentsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Chiles v. Machine Shop, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. Tyler v. Livonia Public SchoolsMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Collins v. Blue Cross Blue ShieldMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Donahoo v. Master Data CenterDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2003
  5. Lown v. JJ Eaton PlaceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API