Legal Opinion
Donahoo v. Master Data Center
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided July 29, 2003No. 02-73675PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
EDMUNDS, District Judge.
The matter came before the Court on Defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff filed suit against Defendant, her employer, claiming that Defendant violated her rights under the Family and Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”) and the Michigan Persons with Disabilities Civil Rights Act (“PWDCRA”), unlawfully retaliated against her for asserting her rights under the PWDCRA, and intentionally inflicted emotional distress upon her. For the reasons fully explained below, the Court should GRANT Defendant’s motion because…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Bragdon v. AbbottSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Miller v. Personal-Touch of Virginia, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2004
- Bellone v. Southwick-Tolland Regional School DistrictDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2013
- Callaway v. Academy of Flint Charter SchoolDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2012
- Bukta v. JC Penney Co., Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2004
- Sims v. SchultzDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2004
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.