Legal Opinion
State v. Duteau
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided February 19, 2002No. AC 20047PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DRANGINIS, J.
The defendant, MacKintosh Duteau, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of sale of narcotics in violation of General Statutes § 2 la-278 (b)1 and possession of narcotics in violation of General Statutes § 21a-279 (a).2 On appeal, the defendant claims that (1) the trial court improperly denied his motion to suppress a photograph taken of him by police officers, (2) he was subject to an illegal search and seizure in violation of his rights as set forth *250in article first, §§ 7 and 9, of the constitution of Connecticut, (3) the police…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. HerediaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- State v. BeliveauConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- State v. RosedomConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. HamptonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- State v. JohnsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- State v. BoydConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- State v. JohnsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Parley v. ParleyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.