Legal Opinion

Cardiff v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 5, 1952No. 12945_1PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DENMAN, Chief Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment convicting Cardiff of violating Section 331(f) of 21 U.S.C.A. by his refusal to permit entry and inspection of the premises of the Washington Dehydrated Food Company of which Cardiff was manager.

The stipulated facts are as follows: That the Washington Dehydrated Food Company, a corporation, is a processor of food, manufactured, packed and held for introduction into interstate commerce; that the appellant, Ira D. Cardiff, is the President of said corporation and was the operator and custodian of the factory of the Washington Dehydrated Food…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. WeitzelSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Pasadena Research Laboratories, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
  3. United States v. CardiffDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1951

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. CardiffSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Cecil William Myers and Joseph Howard Sims v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  3. Cardiff v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
  4. People of Puerto Rico v. Superior Court of Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1960
  5. Pueblo v. Tribunal Superior de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API