Legal Opinion

United States v. Cardiff

District Court, E.D. Washington

Decided January 23, 1951No. C-4308PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DRIVER, Chief Judge.

Defendant, Ira D. Cardiff, was charged by information with violation of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act,1 hereinafter referred to as the Act, based on refusal of defendant to permit entry for purposes of inspection. The information alleges the following facts:

Defendant is the president of Washington Dehydrated Food. Company, a Washington corporation, and the operator and custodian of a factory at Yakima, Washington which is owned by said corporation. The Yakima factory manufactures, processes, packs and holds food for introduction into interstate commerce.

On or…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hale v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. United States v. DotterweichSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Hipolite Egg Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  4. McDermott v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  5. Seven Cases of Eckman's Alternative v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. CardiffSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Cardiff v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
  3. Cardiff v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API