Legal Opinion

Rio Hondo Memorial Hospital v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided September 22, 1982No. 75-80CPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKashiwa, Judge

This case, before us on cross motions for summary judgment, requires the court to determine the appropriate treatment under Medicare of sales transactions between related parties that were completed before the effective date of the Medicare Act. Specifically, plaintiff, the provider, seeks to deduct the interest expense incurred by its owner in purchasing plaintiffs assets from a related party as a reasonable cost of providing care. Secondly, plaintiffs owner seeks to increase the valuation of plaintiffs assets as a result of the sale in order to claim a stepped-up basis for depreciation.

On…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. United States v. Erika, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Doyle v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
  4. Whitecliff, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
  5. Pacific Coast Medical Enterprises v. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Lockheed Corporation v. Sheila E. Widnall, Secretary of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
  2. Dickinson Nursing Center v. North Dakota Department of Human ServicesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Trull Nursing Home, Inc. v. State Department of Human ServicesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
  4. Royce v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
  5. West Seattle General Hospital, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API