Legal Opinion

Whitecliff, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 12, 1976No. 407-74PublishedCited by 119 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavis, Judge

This controversy between a provider of services under the Medicare program and the Government presents primarily a dispute over 42 U.S.C. § 1395x(v) (1) (1970) ,1 relating to the reimbursement to be made to a Medicare provider. Both parties have moved for summary judgment but we find that we cannot dispose of the case finally.

By contract accepted by the Government in 1966, plaintiff Whitecliff, Inc., operating an extended care facility, became a Medicare provider and thus entitled to reimbursement by the Government for reasonable costs incurred in giving services to Medicare beneficiaries.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Johnson v. RobisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by119 opinions

  1. Bowen v. Georgetown University HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Good Samaritan Hospital v. ShalalaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. United States v. California Care Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  4. Pacific Coast Medical Enterprises v. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  5. Springdale Convalescent Center v. F. David Mathews, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977

114 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API