Legal Opinion

Howe v. Tarloshaw

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 7, 1925No. 16085PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff in error, R. D. Howe, was guardian of the person and property of Louisa and Mista Tarloshaw, orphan Indian minors, for a period of approximately ten years. When the wards -became of age tliey demanded a report and accounting. A report was made which was contested and a number of items disallowed by the special judge in the county court. From the order of the county court disallowing these credits, Howe appealed to the district court,, where the case was referred to a referee.

A stipulation was entered by the parties before the referee restricting the hearing to the particular items…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Vann v. Union Central Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. Howe v. TarloshawSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  3. Hollister v. KorySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. McCornack v. FlemingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  5. Midland Valley R. Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Randol v. Harbour-Longmire Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  2. Sand Springs Railway Co. v. McWilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  3. Burton v. GravesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  4. Kawfield Oil Co. v. Lashley & RamboSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  5. Sabin v. LevorsenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API