Legal Opinion

Kawfield Oil Co. v. Lashley & Rambo

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 19, 1926No. 16780Published

1Opinion of the CourtPhelps, J.

This case is before us on a motion to dismiss the appeal because the appeal is frivolous and for delay. The defendants in error filed their suit in the district court of Tulsa county to recover from the plaintiff in error on an account. The account was verified and attached to the petition, which was also verified. The plaintiff in error, who was defendant below, answered by filing a verified general denial.

On March 2, 1925, the cause was set for trial on March 13, 1925, and on March 5, 1925, after first obtaining leave of court, plaintiffs -who are de.endants in error here, filed their reply…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Walcott v. HardisterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  2. Howe v. TarloshawSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  3. Jackson v. Durant Nat. BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API