Potter v. Ahrens
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from an order denying a new trial. Lhcien Shaw, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtVan Fleet, J.
The court found, substantially as alleged in the complaint, that on the second day of May, 1893, the defendants were engaged in the business of preparing, dealing in, and vending all kinds of foreign and domestic delicacies for the table, such as prepared *678meats, breads, cakes, pies, canned goods, and other household supplies of the kind; and were on said date the owners of a stock of such goods, together with furniture, ranges, etc., used by them-in said business, at their place of business in the city of Los Angeles. That on said date defendants sold to plaintiff and one Andrew Wood their…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Bowne v. PotterNew York Supreme Court · 1837
3Cited by10 opinions
- McCarthy v. TallyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Anaheim Citrus Fruit Ass'n v. YeomanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Merchants' Ad-Sign Co. v. SterlingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Shafer v. SloanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
- Farthing v. San Mateo ClinicCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.