Legal Opinion
Hobart-Mayfield, Inc. v. National Operating Committee on Standards for Athletic Equipment
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided April 22, 2021No. 2:19-cv-12712Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION HOBART-MAYFIELD, INC., D/B/A MAYFIELD ATHLETICS, Plaintiff, Case No. 19-cv-12712 v. U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE NATIONAL OPERATING COMMITTEE ON GERSHWIN A. DRAIN STANDARDS FOR ATHLETIC EQUIPMENT, ET AL., Defendants. ______________ / OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS [#62] I. INTRODUCTION On September 16, 2019, Plaintiff Hobart-Mayfield, Inc. (“Mayfield”) filed the instant action against Kranos Corporation (“Schutt Sports”), Riddell, Inc., Xenith, LLC, Gregg Hartley, Michael Oliver, Vincent Long,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Board of Trade of Chicago v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Total Benefits Planning Agency, Inc. v. Anthem Blue Cross & Blue ShieldCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.